Organizing is Not Decluttering

What’s the best way to declutter a space?

The first solution most people jump to is organization. They find storage boxes into which to stash their horde of items. The boxes are then placed out of the way in a closet, attic, or basement for months or years to come. Problem solved right?

According to the Minimalists, this approach is the worst way to approach decluttering. Why?

Because all you are doing is moving items from one place to another. The clutter is put out of sight but not removed entirely. In a recent video on their Instagram channel, the Minimalists argue that storage boxes are actually “clutter coffins where all your stuff goes to die.”

Worst still, many people use up valuable space in their homes or even rent space in a storage locker to keep these completely unneeded belongings in their lives.

What is the best way handle clutter?

The Minimalists believe that completely letting go of our unnecessary items is the path to declutter. Reducing our belongings clears up space, both physically and psychologically. That way we can use our physical spaces to store only the things we currently value. As well, we keep our minds clear by removing items that no longer match who we are and what we aspire to do.

Therefore, resist the urge to buy that shiny new container. Instead, as Marie Kondo would tell you, discard anything that doesn’t spark joy. Once done, enjoy the results.

Never Leave a Meeting Without Doing This

Imagine a meeting where all the participants are active in the conversation. Great ideas are shared and built upon. Everyone feels excited about the goals discussed. Was that a successful meeting? It could be, so long as something important is done before the meeting is adjourned.

Many seemingly productive meetings end up being for naught if the follow-through is fumbled. To ensure it happens, follow this simple rule.

Never end a meeting without summarizing the decisions and assigning the next actions to move items forward.

Image Generated With AI

Prioritized next actions are the fruits of a successful meeting. When there is uncertainty over who is responsible to do tasks decided upon in the meeting, the risk of inaction is huge. Everyone attending the meeting should be clear on his or her responsibilities before adjournment.

Five key steps to remember:

  • Write down the specific next actions decided on in the meeting
  • Assign the task to participants and make them responsible for completing each action
  • Be clear on the deadlines for each action item
  • Have a means to share updates on each action completed with the rest of the group
  • Finally, decide when and where the next meeting will happen if needed

Follow these steps to ensure that your valuable meetings lead to success afterwards.

The “Two Day” Rule for Habit Change

Did you create a New Year’s resolution?

Did you already abandon it?

With the calendar now reading 2025, this is the time when people make and sadly ultimately abandon their New Year’s resolutions. A resolution simply put is an intention to create a new habit. Despite noble intentions, it is hard to create a new habit that lasts beyond the initial enthusiasm. Willpower alone is never enough. Is there a way to retain the energy of a new behavior so that it becomes successfully engrained for the long term?

In an article on the INC. website, writer Jeff Haden explores this question. He starts by talking about how habits form.

One way to build new habits is to build routines, because routines can be critical to success. Say you’re trying to boost sales, and want to make five cold calls every day. Great: Decide that you’ll make those calls at 10 a.m., block out and protect that time, create a calendar alert, hold yourself accountable by embracing Jerry Seinfeld’s “put an X on the calendar technique,” and get started.

Within a week or two, you won’t have to decide to make five cold calls. You won’t have to force yourself to make five cold calls.

You’ll just make them, because that’s what you do.

Photo by Jessica Thames on Pexels.com

After a habit is established, how do we ensure it does not wither away when time gets tight, or temptation rises up? The best approach is to apply what Haden calls the “Two Day” rule.

The premise is simple: Never let two days pass without acting toward your goal. If your goal is to make five cold calls a day, and you don’t make them today, that’s OK. Just make sure you make five cold calls tomorrow. If your goal is to spend 15 minutes talking to at least one employee every day—about their goals, their ideas, about bottlenecks or logjams you can help clear so they can more easily do their jobs—and you don’t do that today, that’s OK. Just make sure you do that tomorrow.

If you eat out tonight and fall off your diet wagon, that’s OK. Just make sure you get back on it tomorrow.

Learn more about habits and how to sustain them by reading the rest of the article.

Don’t Know the Reason for the Meeting? Then Don’t Meet!

Have you ever left a meeting with a variation of this question spinning in your head:

“What was the reason for that meeting?”

It is very easy to call a meeting, yet few people consider the organizational impact of these gatherings. By simple logic when people are meeting, they are not doing their regular work. If the meeting does not provide value by its end, the impact on the organization is negative in terms of time wasted and energies drained.

Here are three disheartening statistics found on the website Flowtrace.

  • 71% of meetings are considered unproductive by employees.
  • 45% of employees admitted to feeling overwhelmed by attending too many meetings.
  • An estimated $37 billion is lost annually in the U.S. due to inefficient meetings.
Photo by Yan Krukau on Pexels.com

Therefore, it is important to know the right time to call a meeting. Thankfully there is a simple way to determine if a meeting is unnecessary. It goes like this:

If you are unable to articulate the purpose of a meeting, then a meeting should not be called.

Without clarity of purpose, a meeting is destined to slip into a time sink of wasted words. A tool to get off on the right foot is to fill in the blank below with ten words or less:

The purpose of the meeting is ____________.

If you can’t spell out a clearly stated purpose that anyone in your organization can appreciate, then don’t hold the meeting. According to the Flowtrace article, 72% of survey respondents listed setting clear objectives as important for a successful meeting. Therefore, being clear on the purpose is key to making meetings more impactful and energizing.

So, what is the purpose of your next meeting?

Are You an Overthinker?

When encountering a problem, do you spend time thinking about how to solve it?

Usually, it is a good practice to think deeply about how to solve a problem. Understanding the situation and considering ways to solve it can be very helpful. However, is there a limit to how helpful thinking about a problem can be?

According to Darius Foroux, overthinking can be a huge impediment to solving problems. In a recent blog post, he shares how thinking too much can be a trap for the mind.

Despite all this knowledge of philosophy and knowing what I “should” do, I still get caught in bouts of excessive thinking.

During these moments, I no longer observe my thoughts and live in the present moment; my thoughts consume me.

In the past, I was permanently stuck in that state of mind. It’s not uncommon. Most people live their lives as slaves to their thoughts.

When we obsess over our woes, it becomes harder to solve them. So, is there a way to get past repetitive thinking? To resolve the tendency to overthink, Foroux suggests doing a practice that spiritual folk have done for ages.

The key to overcoming overthinking is not only about awareness. Yes, being aware of your thoughts is important. This is the starting point of waking up.

You must become the observer of your thoughts.

But it’s also about understanding your nature.

To understand more about this concept, please read the rest of blog post.

Why You Should Join a Professional Organization

As we move towards the new year, many professional associations are reaching out to retain existing members and invite new people to join. In my case, I am a proud member of the American Library Association, the Public Library Association, CORE, the Florida Library Association, and the Palm Beach County Library Association.

Some people resist joining an association because they don’t see the value in spending money on the membership. However, there are many great reasons to join a professional association and take full advantage of their offerings.

Photo by Christina Morillo on Pexels.com

Here’s my top seven reasons to join a professional association.

Networking Opportunities: Professional associations host events, conferences, and online platforms that allow members to connect with their peers. Access to a community of like-minded professionals fosters collaboration and an exchange of ideas.

Career Advancement: Many associations have job boards, recruitment events, or exclusive listings that help members find new work opportunities. Also, associations provide access to training programs, certifications, and workshops that enhance skills and share new ideas.

Industry Knowledge and Resources: Many professional associations publish journals, articles, and white papers that provide insights into trends and research findings. Members also have access to webinars and speaking events to hear from leaders in the profession.

Credibility and Recognition: Being part of an association can boost member’s credibility and establish them as a respected professional. Many associations set standards and ethical guidelines, helping ensure that members uphold expectations of quality and professionalism.

Advocacy and Influence: Professional associations often lobby for policies that benefit their members and industry. Being a member allows you to have a voice in these advocacy efforts. Some associations offer legal support or resources on hot topic issues.

Leadership Opportunities: Volunteering for committees, boards, or events within the association can develop leadership abilities and help members stand out. This is especially helpful for those who are seeking supervisory experience to improve their resume.

Support and Mentorship: Associations often offer formal mentorship programs that connect less experienced professionals with leaders in their field. Having a network of people in similar positions can provide advice, support, and insight into career challenges.

Give yourself the gift of professional growth by joining an association today. For library workers and supporters, both FLA and ALA lowered their membership rates this year. So now is the perfect time to invest in yourself.

6 Ways to Be More Productive

What do experts in efficiency say are the best ways to be productive?

Journalist Emily Laurence reached out to productivity coaches to learn what they recommend to their clients. She summed up her findings in a recent article in GQ magazine titled 6 Ways to Be More Productive and Actually Get Stuff Done. The first piece of advice was to prioritize what needs to be done.

Productivity coach Juli Shulem says that there’s one word she repeatedly hears from all her clients: overwhelmed. When it comes to being more productive, she says that the biggest roadblock is that most people have no idea where to start. So instead of doing anything, they’re paralyzed and do nothing. Can you relate?

Photo by Pixabay on Pexels.com

So how does one decide where to start? The coach offered this advice.

Shulem says the first step to being productive is getting on paper everything you need to do. This includes both tasks that are immediate and need to be done that day as well as what eventually needs to be done. For big “to-dos” that are farther out, Shulem recommends breaking it down into smaller micro tasks. For example, if you have a big work presentation in three weeks, the micro-tasks could be research, building your deck, and doing a run-through of exactly what you’re going to say.

To learn the other five ways to be more productive, please read the rest of the article.

When to Check Your Tech & How to Stop

Have you ever checked your phone for a social media update in the middle of a meeting? Or started looking at news headlines in the middle of a group lunch? Or got distracted by unimportant texts while doing deep work on a project?

It is very easy to be drawn into looking at our phones. This can lead to unproductive behavior and sloppy work. A recent article by Liz Fosslien on the Pocket website wonders why we have allowed these habits to become socially accepted.

I used to do nothing in the face of indiscriminate gadget use. Now, I’ve come to believe that doing nothing is no longer O.K. Staying silent about bad technology habits is making things worse for all of us.

Photo by iam hogir on Pexels.com

How do we as a change these habits to make them less desirable? Perhaps we need to develop what investor Paul Graham calls “social antibodies.”

He uses the example of cigarette smoking: smoking in public became taboo over the span of just one generation after social conventions changed.

Like cigarettes, our personal technology use can become a bad habit. People enter a zone when they use their gadgets. Checking email or scrolling through Facebook can be intoxicating and disorienting. Tech makers design these products using the same psychology that makes slot machines addictive. The variable rewards built into apps make time pass quickly and can make people oblivious to what’s happening around them.

How can we build up social antibodies in the workplace? One way is to set up well articulated standards.

The best way to prevent this waste of time is for someone senior to mandate a “no-screen meeting.” In my experience conducting hundreds of workshops, the discussions declared device-free are by far more productive. Setting expectations up front is equivalent to administering a distraction vaccine.

Learn more about how to build social antibodies by reading the rest of the article.

To Solve a Problem, Take Something Away

There’s a funny thing about the human mind when it comes to problem solving. Usually, we look for solutions that add something to the equation, whether it be another resource, person, or strategy. Yet is it easier to solve problems by removing things?

In an article by Diana Kwon for Scientific America, she explores the reason that removing something is a often the more efficient problem-solving strategy. She uses the example of teaching a child to ride a bike.

For generations, the standard way to learn how to ride a bicycle was with training wheels or a tricycle. But in recent years, many parents have opted to train their kids with balance bikes, pedal-less two-wheelers that enable children to develop the coordination needed for bicycling—a skill that is not as easily acquired with an extra set of wheels.

Photo by Leeloo The First on Pexels.com

Later in the article she explores research done at the University of Virginia. Observational studies of people solving problems highlighted some interesting patterns.

The researchers first carried out a set of observational studies, assessments without a control group, to see whether this bias existed at all. In one, they asked 91 participants to make a pattern symmetrical by either adding or removing colored boxes. Only 18 people (20 percent) used subtraction. In another, the team scanned through an archive of ideas for improvement submitted to an incoming university president and found that only 11 percent of 651 proposals involved eliminating an existing regulation, practice or program.

Is there a way to guide people to consider removing items rather than adding? Turns out a little nudge in the right direction can do the trick.

The researchers also observed that people were more likely to remove features when they were given more opportunities to consider alternative ways to address a problem: when participants were asked to create a symmetrical pattern by adding or eliminating colored blocks, they opted for removal more often if they were given practice trials than if they had just one chance to tackle the problem. On the other hand, having to simultaneously juggle another task—such as keeping track of numbers on a screen—made individuals less likely to subtract elements to solve the same problem, suggesting that it requires more effort to think up subtractive solutions than additive ones. 

Read the full article to learn more about how to consider subtractive solutions.